Philip Collins
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
School Gate: Why today's decision is a bad example for children
It is a basic rule of democracy that the person who wins always deserves to. The same is true in competition. If no rules have been broken, the winner deserves their victory. So there is no doubt that John Sergeant deserves his place in Strictly Come Dancing. And no doubt either that it's time to get rid of him.
The glorious British tradition of radical dissent now has a dancing footnote. Establishment figures have rarely come as camp as the four judges but the Vote Sergeant campaign has been as much a two-fingered salute to authority as it has a verdict on his footwork.
On that matter, the actual dancing, everyone knows he's hopeless. He's Eddie the Eagle in sequins, the latest in the long line of sorry losers whom we mistakenly assume to be charming because they have achieved the distinction conferred on all of us of being rubbish.
The whole point of competition is that rubbish gets rooted out. Competition without a winner is just people doing something odd, for no apparent reason. And Strictly Come Dancing is a competition. There would be no judges if it were not. There would be no public vote. The drama is not that everyone is trying to dance. It's that everyone is trying to win. The competition is the entertainment, even when the dancing is no good. To say it is just light entertainment is to miss the point.
And if it's a competition - which it obviously is - then it ought to be judged according to the rules, which are, surely, about the ability to dance. Of course we are free to choose our own criteria. We could call it Strictly Having a Laugh and be done with it. Might as well make it a parade of national treasures and give the award to Alan Bennett every year. But it's not about being genial. It's about dancing.
The best competitions reward skill. Games are not matters of chance and, although luck plays a part, if fortune is the arbiter then it is a dull game. Rules are a framework for talent, and to enthrone someone whom we all know is useless makes a mockery of the other contestants. There has been a lot of guff about how hard Sergeant is trying and how much he has improved (he hasn't). But what about Rachel Stevens? How do you think she feels?
And even if Strictly Come Dancing were just entertainment - which it is not - it would rapidly cease to be entertainment if all the contestants were like Sergeant. Apart from the irony of knowing that he is hopeless and yet may survive, the entertainment value of watching Sergeant dance is nil.
William James said that a sense of humour was common sense dancing. The joke is wearing thin. It's time the dancers prevailed.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Does it really matter whether you can dance or not? I have never cared who can dance on SCD but have just enjoyed the celebrities trying something new and being entertaining. I think the judges are taking the whole thing too seriously This is just a Saturday night light entertainment show isn't. it?
M. R., Inverkip,
I cannot believe how many people are prepared to accept substandard performance. Sarge on top isn't the populus engaging in radical dissent, it's the old English disease of low self-esteem. Vote for the fool and deflect attention from your own inadequacy.
John Stitch, London,
John Sergeant has demonstrated better judo skills than danciing skills - his detractors have poured endless energy into making themselves look like fools. He is a wise and experienced old owl, and only the naive would mess with him. I fear you have just signed your name on that list.
Nick, Highlands, UK
I'm very disappointed that John was forced to leave as he was obviously touched by all those nasty comments.
He didn't deserve that treatment at all
He's such a gentleman, he never reacted badly to the judges' words and also made a lots of effort and improved a lot.
Please John don't leave !
francesca, london,
I've had to explain to my children that for the people on strictly it is not just taking part that is important - you have to be good. What a terrible example to give to children: don't participate unless you are brilliant in the prescribed manner and bullies win.
Clare Turner, Chittlehamholt, England
The Strictly judges were within their brief to mark and remark, but not to bully a contestant into resignation. They have also bullied the viewing and voting public. They have frankly become too big for their boots. Is this another editorial misfire? Could it have been avoided by early intervention?
John, Biggleswade, United Kingdom
I hope the carping judges and commentators are happy now that John has quit the show. These people have missed the point about SCD which is that it is a vehicle for raising money for charity. The net effect will be less money raised for Children in Need, the charity that SCD supports.
Colin Washbrook, Rochester,
Would that it were a competition. One of the comedy highlights of the past was watching the formation teams on Come Dancing send themselves up.
Now Mr Sergeant, white, old, fat, male and straight, is there to carry the flag of comedy. Keep voting for him!
Dave, Slough,
This is (very) light entertainment, pure and simple. The BBC had a 'proper' dancing contest which they scrapped because it was not sufficiently entertaining. Sargent is the antidote to the vacuuous celebrity culture which has reduced much of television to the will of the baying mob. I hope he wins.
john, Oxford, England
I thought Eddie the Eagle was one of our best skiers. How did he get in the Olympics?
David, Bromley,
Stuff the judges, Sergeant is a star and deserves our vote. This show is entertainment ,not professional dancing.
iain rae, tunbridge wells, t.w.
People don't take kindly to being told who to vote for. That's why this year it snowballed. If the judges knew their place, the public wouldn't be so keen to overrule them. Instead they're too full of their own self importance - it's not like they're going to save the world or something!
Andrew W, Fareham,
Oh come on, get a life. It isn't democracy in action; it isn't a competition to find the best dancer; it's a TV show.
William, Ilkley,
What a curious first sentence. In the UK it is perfectly possible to win an election without a majority of the votes cast, or to become prime minister without any public mandate at all.
Jan, Sussex, UK
One must ask, why did the BBC invite John to participate in SCD if they knew he couldn't dance? I assume the BBC held auditions.
The BBC must have invited him as an object of ridicule. Well it has backfired!
If reports that the rules are to be changed are true, then the BBC will have killed of SCD
James, Poole, UK
Ordinary people are clamouring to put two fingers up to celebrity culture and the PC establishment, all of which despises them. This is a simple, comic way of doing so. Expect a lot more, and in time for it to get serious.
steve moxon, sheffield,
Its great to see personality and Britishness shining through, no matter how much the ego of the stuffy panel gets battered.
If the competition was just about dancing, it would just be professional dancers being judged by a professional panel. Perhaps the panel forgets who is 'Paying the Piper'?
Mike Hart, London, England
If the public want to vote for the girl with the prettiest dress, who are you, or I, to say they are wrong? To claim that it is a competition and should be played by the rules is to miss the point that it is light entertainment. It is meant to entertain, not to inform our moral compass.
Martin, Portsmouth,
And Sergeant still gets my vote...
Brian Lovett, Hastings,
"And even if Strictly Come Dancing were just entertainment - which it is not..."
Re-read that back to yourself a few times, you're losing perspective here. It is exactly "just entertainment".
Tim , London, UK