David Aaronovitch
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
This coming period was - it hoped, and its enemies feared - to be the British National Party's time. Unemployment is rising substantially, and so might the demand for “nationalist” solutions - in which work-grabbing foreigners over here and business-grabbing foreign goods over there, will be given the elbow through cuts in immigration and trade protectionism.
It seemed like that for a while in the mid-1970s too. Unemployment was on the up and there was a sense of national decline. In the 1973 West Bromwich by-election, the National Front, the BNP of its day, in the burly shape of its national organiser, Martin Webster, won more than 16 per cent of the vote. This despite his his unfortunate promise to “build a well-oiled Nazi machine” in Britain.
Paradoxically, as the economy got worse, the NF's fortunes ebbed. Partly this was because of the reaction its success provoked, with organisations such as the Anti-Nazi League being set up to expose the awkward political ancestry of the NF's leading cadres. But the full-scale massacre of jobs that followed the 1979 election gave no benefit whatsoever to the far Right. By then even the pro-Enoch dockers of 1968 were beginning to realise that Britain was a multiracial society.
We are not a militant lot, and far-left and far-right groups have fared worse in Britain than in other countries. They traditionally blame the electoral system for this, arguing that were they able to get a toe in the door the whole fragrant body might follow. But since 1997 we have tested this proposition with proportional representation elections in Scotland, Wales, London and for Europe, and the voters still show a marked reluctance to support extremists. The gain of a London Assembly seat by the BNP last May has led to no dramatic (or undramatic) rise in its support.
The same can be seen in the short history of George Galloway's fabulously misnamed Respect party, an odd alliance of Leninism and Islamism, where success, based on hostility to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, was followed by a plateau, and then a total fracture along its blindingly obvious faultline.
But at least Respect was briefly fashionable among anti-war, arty types. The BNP has never been, and never will be fashionable. It represents anti-fashion, the reaction of the unconsulted and unconsidered (as they like to think of themselves). The difficulty is that, in Britain, the slightly angry silent majority is never going to embrace an organisation that is seen as less than respectable.
The very fear expressed by members “outed” when the BNP's membership list was posted on the internet shows, in part, that they recognise their respectability problem. Small wonder, then, that the BNP's continuing dilemma has been how far and how quickly to make itself respectable at the expense of its own core beliefs.
Moderation sits badly with the BNP. Its activists comprise far more than the usual proportion of convicts and football hooligans. You have only to visit a few neo-Nazi websites to see the crossover between BNP-ers and their unmoderated alter egos.
The leader's own past is evidence enough. Nick Griffin once wrote a pamphlet on Jewish influence in the media and, when I interviewed him six years ago, it was evident that he remained a convinced ideological racist, in that he believed that race equalled destiny. Now he has to pretend not to, hence his claim to be a moderate in a moderate party.
Such a transformation is theoretically possible. Mussolini's heir in Italy, Gianfranco Fini, took the MSI party from his own enthusiastic claim in 1991 that “fascism is alive!” to being a centre-right presence in the Italian Government, in which he has been Deputy Prime Minister and, Foreign Minister. Sometimes in politics, if you pretend to be something long enough, you actually become it. But Griffin is no Fini.
On the website of Simon Smith, until recently a BNP councillor in Sandwell, West Midlands, you may note Smith's urgent belief that the Holocaust never happened, and is all a hoax got up by the Chosen People. This, of course, is not a helpful opinion for a BNP man to express publicly, and Smith is no longer a BNP man.
This is his understanding of the leader's reasoning. “Nick Griffin took the party away from the public debate of Revisionism [a fancy name for Holocaust denial]. In many ways this was understandable. The argument was that before history could be honestly taught, a Nationalist government was needed. In politics expediency is universal.” In other words, Griffin's position is: first get into power and only then tell the “truth” about the Jews.
It is precisely the far Right's militancy that so repels voters and yet so attracts its activists. Take it away, they fear, and you're not left with much, except UKIP Mark II, possibly, and UKIP Mark I is embarrassing enough. It is worth recalling that the BNP was originally a militant split from the then-moderating NF.
This is not to say that there won't be BNP alarums in the next few years. Voters should easily be able to forget the membership lists fiasco, and occasionally vote in another assortment of utterly useless, quarrelsome and temporary councillors. In one or two places, such as Stoke, they may even - like ordure flung against a door - stick for a while. For this purpose the BNP needs no more than 5,000 to 6,000 members to have a noisome presence, and to influence panickers in mainstream parties towards economic and social nationalism.
Simon Smith, the disgruntled anti-Semite, decided that the BNP was “being managed as a state safety valve”, and some might argue that every society could do with a legitimate far-right group to channel the activities of those who hate foreigners. Some may ask, doesn't every good country need a Nazi party? Just so long as it has absolutely no influence and does absolutely nothing is my answer.
*****
Martin Webster points out that he said: "We are building a well-oiled Nazi machine in Britain" in 1962 as a member of the National Socialist Movement, and not in 1973 as a member of the National Front, as might have been inferred from an Opinion column on November 20. We are happy to set the record straight.

David Aaronovitch is a writer, broadcaster and commentator on international politics and the media. He writes for The Times Comment page on Tuesdays. He has previously written for The Guardian, The Observer and The Independent, winning numerous accolades, including Columnist of the Year 2003 and the 2001 Orwell prize for journalism. He has appeared on the satirical TV current affairs programme Have I Got News For You and made radio broadcasts on historical topics
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
C£100K+
Chronophage
Isle of Man
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why don't people just understand what the BNP is about, read there manifesto careful and you will see that they actual supporting modern and realistic ideas. In otherwords understand fully before you critisize.
Steve, Shepshed, UK
And what "unsavoury militancy of its activists" is it that you are talking about?
I am not that one eyed that I could have missed all this militant behaviour.
Tony, Cairns, Australia
Every viewpoint within the whole spectrum of viewpoints is just as valid as another, both extreme left and extreme right. Unless inaccurate fact are involved, all they are is viewpoints. It's quite usual for the same information to generate quite different opinions, and none is better or worse.
Lewis Blight, Nottingham, UK
The BNP probably doesn't seek to be 'respectable'. Does that not imply 'middle of the road' and 'accepted by ther majority'. They're an extreme viewpoint. The same as communists. Neither are respectable as an ethos, but that does not mean that some of their views don't hold value for some people.
Lewis Blight, Nottingham, UK
Cheers for the BNP at least they are trying to get serious concerns sorted
dee, ipswich, england
The BNP is a disgrace to this country, what we stand for and our species. But banning it would only drive it underground, and more dangerous.
Ben, Exeter,
I had a good chuckle at the gentleman who claimed that the BNP were a danger to Britain. Talk about ironic. The BNP, for all their faults, are the only party which seems to want to stop Britain from dying.
Matt, Exeter, UK
Us people on "the list" are proud people. We have stood up for British culture, we are trying to bring back hanging (Baby P !!) and we have actually done something - everyone else has just moaned to each other in the pub. Well you can all now help by joining in and vote - that's still anonymous !!
richard, Manchester, uk
The political spectrum is wide and balanced in the middle (where most of us are), it is democratic and fair precisely because it is wide.
Clip the ends at your peril.
Andy, Liverpool, UK
If David is worried about the BNP perhaps he could comment on some of the concerns that voters have about the way the UK is governed.
He could start with todays news ref.foreign criminals still resident in UK even after deportation orders against them.
Over to you Dave
ron jenkins, Birmingham, England
Laurence, Hemel Hempstead , UK
Shown up for what?
What the BNP say is exactly what the majority of British people want. What are you going to do? Expose the British people to...the British people?
Phill, Cheshire, UK
70%? where did you get that figure Keith? At least 30% of the public are ethnic minorities and they're hardly likely to want to be ousted from the country
Edward Basham, High Wycombe,
I have no truck with BNP racism, but with all the main political parties with almost identical anti patriotic left wing policies, obsessed with equality, diversity, women and minority only shortlists etc, all directed by the Chianti sipping smug media elite, It leaves a huge gap for the BNP to fill
Andy, Orpington, UK
70% of the British public support hanging, repatriation of foreigners and withdrawal from the EU. No political party but the BNP endorses these ideas. The liberal establishment just chortles, wipes its brow and thanks the heavens everytime the British people don't vote for what they really want.
keith b, wigan, uk
The people who are a real threat are unelected journalists who impose their views on everyone else and claim that they have moral high ground.
Alison, Warrington, UK
If you don't like the BNP then it's pretty simple-don't vote for them!
David, Northants,
You don't have to be of the far right to have doubts about significant aspects of the mainstream acounts of the holocaust
James, London, uk
I think you might be under-estimating the support for the BNP, I know many people who will say they support "SOME" of their policies in the privacy of their own home, but would never admit in a crowd or to an opiniin poll.
Brian Wilson, Edinburgh,
They may not gain respectability but on immigration, the main issue, support is widerspread than many will admit. 800,000 votes at the European elections, 79% in a CIPD poll wanting a cap on immigration in the current economic climate and doubtless many others who dare not publicy voice support.
i.e., Norwich, England
The reason the establishment politicians/media are so scared of the BNP is because they speak the truth on behalf of ordinary people, and that just won't do will it.
Bob, London, England
Dave, Menlo. If I went onto an American forum and said I was a member of the Workers' Revolutionary Party, I would be criticised to the high heavens. The far-Right present a clear and present danger to the UK and what it stands for and they need to be constantly challenged and shown up.
Laurence, Hemel Hempstead , UK
I am not a BNP supporter, but am still disgusted at the hypocritical, skewed and openly aggressive/dismissive way that they are treated by the media, especially the BBC. Yesterday's Today show 'interview' (a.k.a snarling attack) was typical. Free speech? Balanced reporting? Good journalism?
Tom Atkins, London, UK
As usual in these circumstances one should preface any comments by saying that I am not a BNP member nor a supporter of it at all. Furthermore I am no anti semite, though I do confess to a degree of discomfort over Israel and its behaviour. There. Revisionism David isn't denial.
Ian, Bideford, uk
Quite astonishing, not to mention disturbing, that a Times correspondent would seek to suppress the British public's right to democracy.
Alastair Johnson, Alicante, Spain
To JF in Canterbury.. "(a) political nutters have absolutely no chance of getting into power,
We have the Labour Party in power...enjoy the next year or two, or perhaps you are not old enough to remember the Winter of Discontent.
douglas, London, UK
Re: Logan. The 'Great' in 'Great Britian' was put in by geography. It specifically refers to Britian being a collection of islands. Nothing more nothing less. You also might want to look up the role of Liberalism in the making of of the British Empire.
oliver, London,
Yes, we live in a free society but there has to be constraints on it. Otherwise what is to stop a group of peadophiles from starting up a political party - nothing I hear you say? Maybe in time, their policies would become popular, all they'd have to do is make themselves nationalists!
kim, london,
I am not a member and would not vote for them, however I do not want anymore immigration, I don't want any more appeasement of groups opposed to 'British' values (however bad they my become). I don't think that makes me even right wing, it makes me realistic about protecting our way of life!
Paul McCann, silverstone, uk
The very ordinariness of those on the BNP list shows its membership to be remarkably conventional. Of course, the BNP can never make itself respectable as far as the politically correct are concerned.
Derek, Taunton, UK
Even still, as we live in a free society, they are entitled to their views and to belong to such a group. This is the essence of democracy. If their message is not to the liking of the majority (as appears to be the case) then they will not be elected. Perhaps the ad hominem attacks should cease?
A.N, Greenwich, UK
Well if the BNP are allowed to join the democratic process in elections - why the sudden amazement that people belong to them now ?
ian payne, WALSALL,
A caveat to taking a hard line with racism is that it then goes underground. If people are hounded or forced by law to join in the multiracial society then they will bottle up their feelings of resentment. I believe this added fuel in the last Balkans conflict. Discussion is surely best.
John, Sydney, Australia
anybody that honestly believes that the holocaust never happened must be absolutely insane. theres plenty of evidence, uno, 6,000,000 people disappeared from the face of the earth for 1 thing. look around aushwitz and see the huge piles of shoes and glasses that represent murdered people.
will, grimsby, uk
JF
The Ironic thing is that we do have exactly (a) that is the problem. I am not racist but I am Nationalist and all for preservation of a culture, I am however anti liberal because the Great in Great Britain was not created by Liberalism. Not a BNP´er either.
Logan, London, UK
I have to redress the balance a bit seeing that 3 of the 4 existing comments read as an apologia for the BNP. Hitler was elected as a new broom, to free the country of anti-social elements and to banish weak, failed democracy. Marxists and foreigners were the main enemies. Enough said?
John, Worthing, UK
Dave of Menlo Park has hit the nail on the head: however right it is to loathe what the BNP stands for, persecuting people for their political beliefs is just as dangerous, and for people to lose their jobs just because their names appear on a BNP membership list is very disturbing.
Stephen Morris, Shrewsbury, England
But the BNP are respectable. The list contradicts the liberal-controlled media's long popularised image of the BNP as skinheads. Who do you think the public believe, the newspapers or the evidence?
Paul, Notingham, England
So, if you have any objections to unrestricted immigration into the UK, concerns about the negative effects of multiculturalism, or what to see extreme Islamism constrained, you're a Nazi are you? I don't support the BNP, but they are a legitimate political party and aprt of our free society.
Sean Hunter, Glasgow,
While I don't disagree with what Mr. Aaronovitch has said, I think that people are being threaten in the UK for their political beliefs is a more immediate issue. It is disappointing that he didn't speak out on that instead.
Dave, Menlo Park, CA, USA
When people criticise the BNP they always choose the worst bigot in the party. These people exist in every party but are ignored except for in the BNP. Disgraceful misrepresentation of a working class party by the middle classes in their country houses who don't live with the problems.
Neil Hughes, Birmingham, England
The biggest fear besides Islamism, radicalism, the failed multiculturalism and excessive immigration we have here in the UK and EU is that of reconstituted Marxists in the media and the many in the positions of power eg in the Nu Lab government (BTW I am not a BNPer)
David Cartright, Birmingham,
Well said, David. Thank heavens we live in a country where (a) political nutters have absolutely no chance of getting into power, (b) where the vast majority are embarrassed by racist and anti-semitic ranting. If only Hitler had died of his wounds in 1918; failing that, hadn't managed to get power.
JF, Canterbury, UK