Dan Sabbagh, Media Editor
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Sir Michael Lyons, the head of the BBC, told MPs yesterday that Jonathan Ross could face further punishment later this week – only to change his mind hours later. In the morning, the Chairman of the BBC Trust said that Radio 2 was wrong to say that Ross would return to his Saturday morning slot on January 24 because the trust had yet to finish its inquiry into the Andrew Sachs phone affair.
However, by the afternoon, as websites picked up on the possibility that Ross could not be sure of his job, the trust backed down and said that there was no new evidence against him.
When first asked by John Whittingdale, the chairman of the Commons’ Culture Committee, whether Radio 2 had been “somewhat premature” in telling listeners when Ross would be back, Sir Michael talked tough, saying: “Let me be clear. The BBC Trust has not finished in its deliberations. All these matters are subject to the final decision.”
That appeared to suggest the possibility of further punishment for Ross. Hours later, however, the trust issued a statement saying that it “does not expect the Director-General’s final report to provide new information of substance relating to Jonathan Ross’s role which would lead it to change its view on his part in this incident”.

Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
C£100K+
Chronophage
Isle of Man
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Jenny, London
Your logic is flawed. Just because most people didn't hear this rubbish live doesn't invalidate their opinions on it's offensiveness. It just means they had something better to do than listen to Russell Brand's show.
j griffiths, manchester, england
Sack Ross, + withdraw the BBC's public funding.
Let them both find their way in the free market.
Adam, London,
Only two actual complaints and thousands after it had hit the papers? Can't (some) people see that this event was the last straw of Ross's everlasting lewd and crude comments on all his shows not just this episode. More lthan time for Ross to act like an adult and be accountable for his actions.
Rebekka May, Wymondham, UK
From across the pond - this all seems slightly overblown.
Bessy, Island, Canada
At the time of broadcast only 0.0001% of listeners complained. This show had a following of around 2 million every week and thus I dissagree with J Griffiths that D Harrison is in the minority!
Jenny, London,
It's funny how all but 2 of the 'record number' of complaints were made once it had made the papers. All that was needed was wrist-slap, the editorial staff punished for airing it, and a full apology to Andrew Sachs.
An utterly ridiculous situation. They should be be re-instated now.
Ben, Shepton Mallet,
Have I Got News For You is a better show without Angus.
They should do the same with Wossie's vacant slots -
This week's guest presenter/ 'house' band......!
I'd do his radio show just for the fun of it (and do a better job): I'm 47, semi-literate with a sense of humour - an ideal candidate!
Michael John Leopard, Hambledon,
Liable laws in the UK have been broken by the broadcast in my opinion... Johnathan Ross should have resigned immediately and come back in a year or so. Instead, his career will probably be tarnished by the affair for years to come.
Faux Pas.
Ben Woodward, Cheltenham, England
This is ridiculous, including what D Harrison says.
All should recognise the distinction between utter contempt for human dignity and "humour" which today is seldom funny or are people so desensitised from what passes on the media as normal these days that they cannot tell the difference?
Stephen Felce, Enfield, UK
D Harrison, you appear to be in the minority considering the record number of complaints. This is about standards - something the last few generations haven't been taught.
Malice or not - how would you like someone to insult your wife/daughter/granddaughter on national radio? Thought not.
j griffiths, manchester, england
This is ridiculous. Anyone who actually listened to the broadcast could tell there was absolutely no malice. Has anyone else in history been fined over £1 million for a misjudged joke?
D Harrison, Brighton, UK